This has been talked about before but just I'm just wondering - could something be done about shipping cost calculation for stickers? I currently have 2 orders that are just stickers, and because the system doesn't take sticker packaging weight into account I lost €2,63 on stamps. It's not a huge deal, and I understand you can factor it into "cost of business", which I've always done. But since it's just a recurring issue, I just think it would be a really nice little improvement if this could be fixed.
I know there's no immediate easy fix.. but perhaps a shipping method feature "add ... gram if the order contains one or more stickers" - or if you want to make it more fancy, to do it only in the case the sticker sheet is bigger than a few cm2 - or if you're max advanced, add ... gram per square cm of sticker. Anyway, even a simple option to add 20 gram when there are stickers would help a great deal and account for most of my lost stamps.
Comments
> @teup Most stickers go flatrate I suppose, while parts do not (except tiles maybe). Why not simply reduce you weight limits for flatrate by 10-15 grams, 20-25 for large envelopes? I've never had the issue you describe and I ship out many stickers ;-)
In The Netherlands letters can be up to 3.2 cm thick, so almost every part can be shipped as letter. So reducing weight limits will mean that buyers pay higher postage than necessary if they buy parts. I just accept the extra postage on the occasional sticker order as a cost of doing business, but it would be nice if we could have a way to account for the weight of extra cardboard when shipping stickers.
Obviously this only works for small and medium sized stickers, to remain within flatrate dimensions of envelopes. Larger sheets will always end up in the 'oversized' method (up to 3/3.2 cm) off course.
Anyway I'm past all that, I use shipping boxes for all international orders (3 types) and pay exact weight at PostNL, compared to the pre-setted weight classes I've set for customers, so even when an order is 10-15 grams higher then my pre setted weights, it only represents a few cents extra on that particular order, often compensated by other orders because of the 'by the gram' billing I get by PostNL. It creates me the great luxury of not having to bother to have something within a weight limit, take a bigger box if it's easier to pack, and still have enough spare to ship a backorder now and then.
Dunno what kind of trouble you had, but any trouble can happen with any shipper... ( had my share with Bpost as well).
I could use 'letters' as well with PostNL, but I don't bother. I've used the 'letter' format with Bpost for a decade and it's just more work (at least the way I wrapped), less safe against damage and the price difference is not significant enough to have me set up 2 separate shipping methods. My standard 'box' format (30mm) with PostNL is being shipped as a letter, it's just a little safer compared to padded mailers (and the 15/30 grams of extra weight are not significant enough).
It makes 'organising' my shipments easier (I need to take weight myself and put them on a consignment note), reduces the number of 'types' of shipments I need to generate, reduces the amount of types of packing materials, etc etc etc. So when I decided to work with them, I just 'skipped' on padded mailers for several reasons.
I do use PostNL from time to time but through gritted teeth. You only see the truth about a company when you see their reaction when things go wrong. PostNL's reaction was to obstruct me at every stage.
An order to Poland of 60 grams (=100 grams shipment) would force me to charge the buyer around €5.47 if I use Bpost.
€3.90 for the stamp, €0.82 VAT (and I can't deduct it, it just goes straight to the VAT office), €0.75 handling (contains cost of mailers/boxes/etc and the basis PP cost of €0.35)
With PostNL I charge that same buyer €2.21, final cost, including handling and VAT
I consider that difference significant enough to chose PostNL above Bpost ;-)
Do you mind sharing your source?
Tyson.
@leopard37 - storopack, though my post should have said 30mm not 3mm. Consequence of using on-screen keyboard due to feeding baby with my other hand ;)
They also have tape and ziplocks, so pretty easy to reach the 'free shipping'
> @teup Most stickers go flatrate I suppose, while parts do not (except tiles maybe). Why not simply reduce you weight limits for flatrate by 10-15 grams, 20-25 for large envelopes? I've never had the issue you describe and I ship out many stickers ;-)
That'd be a great loss, counting 10 extra grams on top of every order. My shipping prediction is correct 99% of the time, modifying it like this would make it off very frequently. I would rather sometimes pay a little extra than overcharge orders by counting double packing material weight on every single order.
I don't have any contract with PostNL, except looting Bruna for stamps each december ;) Though this time I used the webshop, and part of the shipment got lost, and then they sent everything again, leaving me with €70 of extra stamps. That was fun :D Great webshop..
Have you ever considered talking to their 'pro' service? You have a VAT number, so you should be able to work in a similar way as I do. Dunno how it works in NL offcourse, my operation is with the Belgian division of PostNL
But of course, I'm lucky to have this nice man as the head of my PO.
> @teup Just to be clear, I do not put on stamps, I simply put on a label 'postage paid', which PostNL provides me. All shipments go on a consignment note with destination, weight and the type of shipment.
> Have you ever considered talking to their 'pro' service? You have a VAT number, so you should be able to work in a similar way as I do. Dunno how it works in NL offcourse, my operation is with the Belgian division of PostNL
Thanks for the advice, might be worth a shot! But there's already a business solution called a frankeermachine to get a lower rate, and I already looked into that and my number of shipments is slightly too low for it (I believe you need like 50 a week or something like that). That'd make me suspect no interesting contract would be possible..