I often keep asking myself, why do sites like BL and BO not use the official LEGO color names? Would it not be much easier? In the case of BL I can understand that for colors that go way back maybe official names were not available for all colors available but on BO,?
I mean, take a color name like Medium Dark Flesh. Is there a Dark Dark Flesh and a Light Dark Flesh too? (rhetorical question). It doesn't seem to make much sense.
Does anybody know why it is like this? It seems it would be far easier and less confusing to just use the official color names.
Thanks,
Ken
Comments
TLG doesn't and their naming is limited to what they produce... But they also tend to change colors, which would make it complicated for sites like this, as the catalog needs to hold 60 years of colors ;-) Besides, it's not like TLG's naming is all saying... Euh Brick Yellow ??? I prefer Tan... And that is what most people would call it, based on what people learned 'colorwise' from their parents ;-)
I have got so used to the BO color names though that I sometimes have to remind myself that LEGO probably has a different name for a particular color.
I'm holding the data for myself for now because if I have anything incorrect I don't want to muddy what's already out there - but honestly what's already out there is pretty inconsistent. I kept seeing a wide range of RGB/hex values and confused naming and sometimes sites with seemingly official info had some codes wrong - not the official LEGO codes for the colors. Typos can result in terrible long-term problems for others.
I think part of the problem is that some people who made "official" lists took colors from the 3D tools from LDraw or LDD - some of these lists reference that, others don't. The color names also have differences for the same reason. Also, LEGO themselves I believe in some cases (at least for the grays) used the same color name even when they adjusted hues slightly over the years from warmer hues to more neutral hues. When buying a batch of used bricks recently (locally, not via stores on BrickOwl), I saw at least 3 different tones for what was effectively the same intended gray - and not due to aging but the changes LEGO has done over the years.
The way I would personally deal with all of this is how I deal with any data project that at some point needs a public interface -- gather as much data as possible, from as many sources as possible, correlate, verify, weight the most accurate and then set up a normalization table so that regardless of what someone was looking for if their intent is understood then the best match can be made along with the most accurate code that would correspond with the source they want to used the code with. There should be very few mis-matches in that case. I have some web-based graphics code I've worked up last year that I might also use to do a visual display RGB match on colors - so that someone looking at a computer screen can see the actual color pretty accurately, not the pseudo-colors seen with renderings out of the 3D programs or the photos taken from various people who use unknown lighting conditions. I might make use of that at some point, but for now... just too busy so will tackle as I have time.
I have Lego's official RGB, Pantone, and CMYK data from 2015 that I still need to add.
BTW Iove your Lego photos, I'll be starting to take shots of my models as I make them and you'd think it would be easy but it's strange how a model in person looks really great but trying to get a good single angle without the presence of the piece getting jumbled up is pretty hard!
Since file sharing doesn't seem to be a feature here yet, I'll put up a slice of what I have that you may not have once my blog is up.