Some thoughts for consideration: -
Feedback is a very important component of on-line trading - anywhere.
If accurate then it gives a good "character" reference - and instills confidence for both buyers and sellers alike.
Also, and perhaps equally important it gives and builds confidence in the sales venue itself.
The biggest problem I have seen here already is a lack of feedback, granted my policy as a seller is to leave feedback AFTER I receive same.
However, as a buyer I expect to leave feedback first, this signifies to the seller that I have received the goods and am happy with the transaction.
I would like to suggest a unique "system" for you to consider, a hybrid without the flaws of other venues of eBay, Amazon and BL
First the major pitfalls of those venues: -
EBay - seller can only leave positive feedback - buyer fraud is on the rise! Also the star system is seriously flawed, a buyer may think they are "being nice" leaving 4 rather than 5 stars, but eBay see anything less than 5 stars as underperforming!
Amazon - little feedback occurs, - which is similar to BrickOwl
BL - several but the worst is warentless and/or tit-for-tat negative feedback.
of those 3 - Amazon DOES have some good features, you can't leave negative feedback without there being a record of comunication between buyer and seller.
eBay also has a good feature - sending (several) automated reminders to "leave feedback" and explaining why it is a good idea to take time to do so.
My suggestion, then, is that both buyer and seller should be able to leave appropriate feedback; either positive, neutral or negative...
BUT to leave a neutral there should be a record of communication between buyer and seller (at least one message to enable)
eg Buyer sends message, seller does not respond only buyer can leave neutral, seller responds then without resolution both may leave a neutral.
To leave a negative you should be able and willing to back up the claim AND provide evidence to have this strike on a buyer/seller's record entered.
Something like "negative feedback pending approval" will show whilst a decision is made, I don't believe this will make much work for Admin, because I do not believe it will occur often (IF at all) - negatives are usually made hastily in an "angry" reaction to something said or done, therefore - UNLESS it is a serious issue - the most likely outcome would be a neutral (which would still require communication between both parties)
AND also implement the eBay style reminders to get folks to leave feedback!
Graham
Comments
However, I don't mind if a buyer doesn't leave feedback, but I do mind that most buyers here don't even mark the order as received.
AND buyers really like to know a sellers reputation too!!
If I have two or more choices from sellers I haven't bought from before - feedback will seal the deal.
As a buyer I always leave honest feedback - if I have nothing nice to say I usually don't leave anything.
In something between 10k- 15k on-line trades I have left a neg (or neutral) less than 10 times
Graham
These issues are relatively minor I suppose but I don't feel I should have to change my shipping process as a preventative measure because someone else may or may not spam the buyer. Furthermore as I stated in an earlier post ADMIN here does take a good proactive approach to everything so far but once the site it in full swing and has thousands of members there is no way they will be able to warn more sellers/buyers of a potential scammer or trouble maker than the seller or buyer that was duped and leaves appropriate feedback. Just the time zone difference alone is going to be a good delay in getting things done. I notice that already. When I am on in the evenings there is normally not to many people here as I assume it is late at night across the water.
Aside from that I love Brick Owl so far.
Gary