This is a problem I just ran into, over at the other site, but I’m trying to make sure it doesn’t happen here …
Customer orders two sealed sets. The volume of each set, when combined, does not hit the maximum of the shipping method. But the maximum cubic limit for the shipping method does not take in account the void space when trying to co-pack the two sets.
A rudimentary example ..
Set A is 20x10x4 = 800
Set B is 12x10x5 = 600
Total occupied volume for both is 1400
But the space needed to co-pack is actually 20x10x9, or 1800. There is 400 of unused void space. The shipping method has a limit of 1600.
The two items will NOT ship by weight, as the limit is 1728 (one cubic foot).
How can (a) the system be wired to avoid this or (b) to take into account the void space or (c) force the system to a quote request for anything involving more than one lot ?
Comments
You could message admin via Contact Us (bottom of screen) and ask how the algorithm works when calculating multiple sets/large parts to accommodate the voids? That might be the most expeditious way to either set you at ease, or affirm that you may need to further shrink dimensions allowed in your weight bands.
Well yes, there is that option (tinkering with maximum shipping size). But which item(s) do I mark RFQ ? The problem I ran into is not so much any single item causing an issue, it’s the particular combination of items (and the cubic required to contain them).